Arts Law not shy in criticism of Productivity Commission report on AI

Favoring a lack of AI regulation over economic output, the Productivity Commission’s recommendations puts artists at risk.
A group of Star Wars figures with one figure of a sad clown out of place. Productivity Commission AI

In a statement released last week (6 August), The Arts Law Centre of Australia claims that, ‘Artist’s rights are compromised’ in the Productivity Commission’s interim findings in its inquiry, Harnessing data and digital technology. It got us curious, here at ArtsHub. Could artists and creatives really be blind-sided by the Commission’s policy recommendations to government?

Arts Law was not shy in being critical of the PC’s approach in which copyright is diluted, to the detriment of the arts. The organisation has expressed, ‘dismay at the Productivity Commission’s interim report about the possibility of introducing a text and data mining exception to Australia’s copyright regime’.

Unlock Padlock Icon

Unlock this content?

Access this content and more

Gina Fairley is ArtsHub's Senior Contributor, after 12 years in the role as National Visual Arts Editor. She has worked for extended periods in America and Southeast Asia, as gallerist, arts administrator and regional contributing editor for a number of magazines, including Hong Kong based Asian Art News and World Sculpture News. She is an Art Tour leader for the AGNSW Members, and lectures regularly on the state of the arts. She is based in Mittagong, regional NSW. Instagram: fairleygina