Measuring social impact in the arts

Measuring social impact in the arts will elevate the sector and create new opportunities but we need complex, multi-faceted tools.
[This is archived content and may not display in the originally intended format.]

In modern Australia, anxiety in the arts is as present as uncertainty in the economy.  As government budgets are cut, arts and culture programs are scrutinised according to public need and political/electoral advantage.

Philanthropists, traditionally great supporters of the arts, are presented with ever more socially-motivated projects and, as their financial advisers become more sophisticated, there is increasing demand for social impact investing- an opportunity for arts companies to access funds and do good. 

Meanwhile, academia and government is guiding the sector into measurement of cultural and economic value, to evaluate effectiveness of programs and initiatives. This movement presents great opportunity for arts organisations and the sector as a whole.

All these circumstances are pushing us towards ever greater pressure to measure what we do. Greater recognition of the true value of the arts – the sector’s social and economic benefits – will lead to improved funding, partnerships, growth and innovation opportunities.

The challenge of measuring value

Impact measurement in arts often sits in two buckets: the cultural and economic value of the creative industries and the social value created by addressing a range of social needs.

The output and outcomes of arts programs and initiatives can be planned and measured – they are well defined activities with measurable changes for individuals and communities.

For example, an arts program for people who suffer from mental illness may deliver 25 high quality sessions (output) and this may improve the mental well-being for 300 people within a certain time frame (outcome). But, if these people go on to live happy, healthy lives and give back to their community, how much can be attributed to the arts program? How much contribution to broader population benchmarks around mental well-being, resilience and social cohesion can be defined as the social impact of the arts program?

Impact measurement is inherently multi-faceted; the affects of social, cultural, environmental and economic factors interlace to create improved individual and community outcomes. So, how do we measure the true social ‘value’ of the arts?

In answering this question, it’s important to consider some of the wider contribution of art, and it’s process, to our society.

Talking to ourselves, about ourselves.

“Art is not a mirror held up to reality, but a hammer with which to shape it.” –  Bertolt Brecht

Art is an increasingly rare space where the issues, ideologies and ideas that affect our society can be explored and questioned safely, in abstraction. Private thoughts can become public reflections without (necessarily) seeping into the political sphere.

Art can be a mirror, exposing some of our flaws and hidden scars. Art can show us the human outcomes of our politics, laws and social structures; the stories, emotions and personal decisions. Art can shape narratives and shift norms – helping us to bring nuance to debate in mainstream media and around dinner tables. Art can connect people across status and geography, and send shock waves that reverberate across generations.

Frida Kahlo revealed and continues to influence the complexity of female experience, and helped to define national and indigenous identity in Mexico. Ai Wei Wei continues to challenge the definition and bounds of personal and political freedom in modern China. In Australia today, artists are tackling issues like climate change, refugee rights, indigenous identity and gender equality through increasingly accessible platforms.

The subtle shaping and questioning of public sentiment and values is critical to progression as a modern society, but difficult to effectively measure.

Living stories

“I found I could say things with color and shapes that I couldn’t say any other way – things I had no words for.” –  Georgia O’Keeffe

Stories can share deeply personal experiences, create culture and preserve history. Stories of heroes, outlaws, lessons learnt and triumphs won are ingrained in our culture and repeated throughout the stages of our personal growth.

For Indigenous Australians in particular, stories provide critical information about land, animals, hunting, social mores and the spiritual world. They connect younger people to their lineage and create grounding for their evolving identities. They communicate values to live by and build empathy for the experience of others.

Stories are shared, protected and given new life through film, theatre, paint, dance, song or metal. Stories create community value, and often deeply impact people’s lives.

Reflection and restoration

“It’s on the strength of observation and reflection that one finds a way. So we must dig and delve unceasingly.” –  Claude Monet

The process of engaging with or creating art is expressive, restorative, and reflective. It creates a space for analysis and observation of thoughts and emotions, and opens a channel for purposeful expression. The benefit of the arts to mental wellbeing and social connection, especially among disadvantaged and at-risk people, is the subject of growing research. VicHealth – Victoria’s pioneer health promotion agency – is continuing to explore this space through innovative programs and grant rounds.

In a world where commentators decry the narcissism of the “selfie generation”, and the dying of applied empathy, the practice of art has an interesting role to play in fostering a population of socially aware, healthy and resilient Australians.

Looking for answers 

Building the capacity of the arts sector to measure, improve and communicate social outcomes and impact will continue to elevate the role of arts and create opportunities for innovation and cross-sector partnerships. But a nuanced approach is required. Relevant outcomes for individuals and communities must be demonstrated and reported, and broader societal impact must be framed and defined – without missing the bigger picture.

Government and other emerging frameworks can be applied, and evolved to encompass both the direct social needs being addressed, and the contribution of arts to a society that is self-aware, progressive and connected.

Melbourne-based integrated social impact, communications and design agency, Ellis Jones, is developing a social impact framing, measurement and communications approach, specifically for the arts sector. If you have an insight or opinion to add to our thinking, we’d love to hear it.

Contact Ellis Jones

Elise Harper
About the Author
Elise is a senior consultant in social impact at Ellis Jones, an integrated research, strategy, communications and design agency based in Melbourne.